Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076796›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2026

What Phonological Overlap Effects Reveal About the Role of Working Memory in Native and Nonnative Language Processing.

Andromachi Tsoukala, Margreet Vogelzang, Ianthi Tsimpli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andromachi TsoukalaInstitut für Niederlandistik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8930-2408
Margreet VogelzangDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-5419
Ianthi TsimpliDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-7526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study sheds light on effects of similarity-based interference due to phonological overlap (PO), as well as working memory (WM), during silent reading in native speakers (NS) and nonnative speakers (NNS). While prior research has mainly focused on syntactic complexity or ambiguity to gain insight into nonnative language processing and the role of WM, the effects of PO have remained poorly understood. Using multiline texts with varying degrees of PO, we examined whether increased amounts of overlap disrupt online reading and offline recall, and whether effects differ across native and nonnative groups or vary as a function of WM capacity. Results revealed that greater PO caused delays during online processing, but without impacting offline recall. Crucially, NS and NNS experienced online interference similarly, and WM modulated these effects in comparable ways across both groups. These results suggest convergence both in overt behaviour and in how underlying cognitive resources are used. Findings are discussed with respect to their implications for theories of native-nonnative language processing differences and possible directions for further research.

Indexed as

nonnative language processingphonological overlapsilent readingsimilarity-based interferenceworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42076796
PMCPMC13675570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.