ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
A Rare Case of Malignant Plasmacytoma at a Previous Injection Site in a Cat.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A 6-year-old castrated male Bengal cat developed a subcutaneous mass at a previous vaccination site, which was initially diagnosed as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following surgical excision at a local hospital. The cat was referred for metastatic evaluation and further treatment. Computed tomography revealed a residual tumor at the excision site, and an additional thoracic subcutaneous mass was identified. Both lesions were surgically excised and submitted for histopathologic and immunohistochemical examination. Despite the initial diagnosis of lymphoma, immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the neoplastic cells were negative for multiple lineage-specific markers, including CD3, Pax5, CD20, and cytokeratin, but showed strong MUM-1 positivity in mitotically active cells. These findings supported a diagnosis of plasmacytoma. This case emphasizes a diagnostic challenge in distinguishing round cell tumors in cats and the critical role of immunohistochemistry in achieving an accurate diagnosis. The tumor also showed aggressive clinical behavior, including suspected distant metastasis, and may have arisen in association with chronic inflammation at a prior injection site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.