ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Comparing Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Multiple Body Positions in Dogs to Key Cardiac Measurements by Echocardiography.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (cPOCUS) is used to obtain key information about the heart's structure and function when an echocardiogram is not available. This prospective, cross-sectional study aimed to compare fractional shortening (FS%) and left-atrium-to-aorta ratio (LA:Ao) obtained by cPOCUS in different body positions to echocardiography. Thirty-nine dogs had cPOCUS performed in three different body positions: left lateral recumbency (RT), right lateral recumbency (LT), and standing or sternal recumbency (RST). The cPOCUS values from each body position for FS% and LA:Ao were tested for agreement with the echocardiogram by Bland-Altman plots, correct clinical assessment by generalized estimated equation models, and quality score of the cPOCUS images as a percentage. Bland-Altman analysis showed a positive bias for FS% (0.9% to 9.8%) and both positive and negative bias for LA:Ao (within 0.2) for the cPOCUS values. The correct clinical assessment was made in the majority of cases for FS% in RST (67%) and RT (67%), and for LA:Ao in RST (55%). The clinical assessment was more often correct when the image quality score was higher. Intraclass correlation showed good agreement (≥0.61) between investigators for FS% in all body positions and LA:Ao in RT and RST. This study showed that cPOCUS performed from the right hemithorax can provide estimates and correct clinical assessment of FS% and LA:Ao. Obtaining measurements in the LT position is not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.