Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076733›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2026

Comparative Analysis of Abattoir-Based Measures and On-Farm Pig Welfare Indicators in Italian Fattening Heavy Pigs.

Lucia Scuri, Matteo Recchia, Federico Scali, Claudia Romeo, Antonio Marco Maisano, Giovanni Santucci, Camilla Allegri, Marta Masserdotti, Miriam Tenuzzo, Adriana Ianieri and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lucia ScuriDepartment of Food and Drug, Parma University, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Matteo RecchiaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-6634-4410
Federico ScaliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-0587
Claudia RomeoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-2847
Antonio Marco MaisanoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-2273
Giovanni SantucciIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Camilla AllegriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9083-9900
Marta MasserdottiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5066-7036
Miriam TenuzzoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Adriana IanieriDepartment of Food and Drug, Parma University, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Sergio GhidiniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, 26900 Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-0381
Giovanni Loris AlboraliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna 'Bruno Ubertini' (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4693-6395

Funding

Ministero della Salute ClassyFarm project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal welfare monitoring is essential in pig production. On-farm animal welfare (AW) assessments may provide a comprehensive overview but are resource-intensive. Abattoir-based assessments allow pigs from multiple farms to be inspected in a single facility. However, data on the relationship between these assessments remain limited, especially for heavy pigs (160-170 kg). This study investigates these associations in Italian heavy pig production. At the abattoir, 18,333 pig carcasses from 185 batches across 86 farms were scored for tail, skin (cranial and caudal) and ear lesions. On-farm AW assessments (management, structures and animal-based measures) were obtained from the national surveillance system (ClassyFarm). Tail lesion scores were higher in pigs with intact tails, whereas ear scores showed the opposite trend, suggesting a substitution effect between tail and ear biting. This indicates that tail docking is insufficient to fully prevent abnormal behaviours. Higher skin and ear scores were associated with suboptimal management, but tail scores were not, likely due to the multifactorial nature of tail biting. Herd size had no significant effect on welfare indicators. These results highlight the complexity of assessing AW and the importance of combining abattoir and farm data to obtain a more integrated monitoring system.

Indexed as

animal welfarecarcass lesionsear injuriesiceberg indicatorsintensive farmingslaughterhouseswinetail injurieswounds on the body

Identifiers

PMID42076733
PMCPMC13120301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.