ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
On-Field Assessment of Joint Load in Football Using Machine Learning (Part II).
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk is elevated in female youth football, yet knee joint loading has mainly been studied under controlled laboratory conditions. This limits understanding of how injury risk emerges during realistic match situations. This study provided a field-based kinetic characterization of football-specific movements by estimating knee abduction moments (KAMs) using wearable sensors and machine learning. Fifty-two highly talented female youth players performed agility tasks during training, including structured exercises (F-EX) and game-based play (F-GAME). Full-body kinematics were collected with inertial measurement units, and a validated support vector machine model, trained on synchronized motion capture and force plate data, classified trials as high or low KAM. Across 662 change-in-direction trials, 9-12% were classified as high KAM in both conditions, indicating that potentially high-risk loading regularly occurs during routine actions. High KAM trials showed reduced knee and pelvis flexion, increased hip flexion, and greater pelvis rotation toward the cutting direction, reflecting upright, stiff movement strategies. Performance analyses revealed smaller cut angles in exercises and greater approach acceleration in game play, without differences in peak velocity. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of field-based kinetic screening and support a complex-systems perspective on ACL injury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.