ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Postauricular Muscle Reflex as a Potential Objective Measure of Auditory Function in Normal-Hearing Adults.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to establish a protocol for measuring the postauricular muscle reflex (PAMR) and to characterize both short- and mid-latency responses under controlled conditions in adults with normal hearing. PAMR electromyography was recorded in 43 adults with normal hearing. Auditory stimuli (50 ms, 80-100 dB (A)) were presented at four frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz), with systematic variation in stimulation side (ipsilateral/contralateral) and eye position (forward/rotated). The influence of these factors on PAMR amplitude and latency was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. A short-latency PAMR (10-25 ms) was observed in all but one participant in at least one frequency. Reflex amplitude was significantly affected by stimulation side, eye position, frequency, and intensity. Contralateral stimulation produced stronger responses than ipsilateral stimulation. Additionally, a mid-latency PAMR (37-50 ms) was identified in 91% of participants, exhibiting lower amplitude and a higher detection level compared to the short-latency response. The mid-latency reflex was also significantly influenced by experimental conditions. The data shows that PAMR can be reliably recorded under controlled conditions in normal-hearing adults and that both short- and mid-latency components are influenced by auditory and oculomotor factors. These results provide us with normative data that can serve as a reference for future investigations in clinical populations, such as cochlear implant users and individuals with hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.