ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
System-Level Offline Time Synchronization Architecture for Distributed Electrical Signal Monitoring Using Raspberry Pi 5.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate time synchronization is essential in distributed electrical signal monitoring, where phase coherence and event correlation depend on precise timing agreement between acquisition nodes. Conventional approaches often rely on a single synchronization source, typically internet-based Network Time Protocol (NTP) or GPS-disciplined clocks, which is impractical in isolated, offline, or cost-sensitive scenarios. This paper introduces an autonomous offline synchronization architecture for multi-node monitoring systems built on Raspberry Pi 5 (RPI5) platforms connected to a private Ethernet network. Instead of depending on one timing method, the system integrates several complementary mechanisms: battery-backed RTC persistence via the J5 interface, deterministic orchestration through systemd services, automated boot time recovery, chrony-managed NTP discipline, and Precision Time Protocol (PTP) hardware timestamping using PTP Hardware Clock (PHC). Synchronization performance is validated through continuous multi-day measurements of long-term stability, inter-node phase coherence, and short-term jitter. Controlled power-loss scenarios are also included to verify recovery behavior. The system maintains sub-microsecond alignment between nodes using only commodity hardware and no external time source. To further confirm inter-node timestamp alignment at the signal level, both hardware-based reference signal injection and software-based synchronized signal emulation are employed, providing ground-truth validation alongside scalable and reproducible evaluation. The results show that low-cost embedded hardware can support reliable, long-duration synchronization in fully offline installations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.