Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076626›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Botnet Defense System in Grid Topology Networks Using the SIRO Framework.

Mohd Hafizuddin Bin Kamilin, Shingo Yamaguchi, Sena Yoshioka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohd Hafizuddin Bin KamilinDepartment of Intelligent System Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Ube College, Yamaguchi 755-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-7728
Shingo YamaguchiGraduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-8501
Sena YoshiokaGraduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP22K12028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digitalizing essential services opens up a new risk of exposing critical infrastructure to botnet infections. In a grid topology network, the neighbor-to-neighbor paths can be used by the malicious botnet to spread the infection. Previous white-hat worm launchers used heuristics and supervised learning to exterminate botnets, which demand specific conditions or a suitable dataset to be effective. Although reinforcement learning addressed these issues, it requires a longer time to train. This article proposes a framework to shorten training and improve the effectiveness of reinforcement learning. The framework applies four key principles: (1) surveying the network status with multi-tensor input, (2) removing irrelevant actions via a novel Chebyshev-based masking strategy, (3) reinforcing key actions with rewards, and (4) optimizing rewards for winning. Four reinforcement learning algorithms are implemented to evaluate the framework, which are vanilla policy gradient, deep Q-network, proximal policy optimization, and MuZero in a stylized grid topology network simulation. An ablation study indicates that the masking used in identify accounts for the majority of the improvement, whereas multi-channel in Survey alone can reduce performance without complementary masking, rewards, and optimization. With the mean winning rate improved by 49.129% and mean win efficiency improved by 118.8031% against our previous work, the framework effectiveness is confirmed in stylized simulations.

Indexed as

botnetcybersecurityreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID42076626
PMCPMC13120610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.