ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Sensor Data Processing: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Open Challenges.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have recently gained increasing attention as an alternative to conventional neural architectures, mainly because they replace fixed activation functions with learnable univariate mappings defined along network edges. This design not only increases modeling flexibility but also makes it easier to interpret how inputs are transformed within the network while maintaining parameter efficiency. KANs are particularly well suited for sensor-driven systems where transparency, robustness, and computational constraints are critical. This study provides a survey of KAN-based approaches for processing sensor data. A literature review conducted from 2024 to 2026 examined the deployment of KAN models in industrial and mechanical sensing, medical and biomedical sensing, and remote sensing and environmental monitoring, utilizing a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-based methodology. We first revisit the theoretical foundations of KANs and their main architectural variants, including spline-based, polynomial-based, monotonic, and hybrid formulations, to structure the discussion. From a practical standpoint, we then examine how KAN modules are integrated into modern deep learning pipelines, such as convolutional, recurrent, transformer-based, graph-based, and physics-informed architectures. KAN-based models demonstrate comparable predictive performance as conventional machine learning models, while having fewer parameters and more interpretable representations. Several limitations persist, including computational overhead, sensitivity to noisy signals, and resource-constrained device deployment challenges. Real-world sensor systems encounter significant challenges in adopting KAN-based models, including scalability in large-scale sensor networks, integration with hardware architectures, automated model development, resilience to out-of-distribution conditions, and the need for standardized evaluation metrics. Collectively, these observations provide a clearer understanding of the current and potential limitations of KAN-based models, offering practical guidance on the development of interpretable and efficient learning systems for future sensor equipment applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.