ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Recent Progress of Structural Design, Fabrication Processes, and Applications of Flexible Acceleration Sensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible acceleration sensors demonstrate revolutionary potential in healthcare, structural vibration monitoring, and consumer electronics owing to their unique conformal adhesion capability and mechanical adaptability. However, current academic research presents two distinct paradigms for realizing flexibility: one is the hybridly flexible sensor, which incorporates traditional micro-electro-mechanical System (MEMS) acceleration sensor chips with flexible packaging/substrates; the other is the intrinsically flexible sensor, whose sensing unit and substrate are entirely composed of flexible materials enabled by microstructural design. This review first analyzes the fundamental differences and design challenges between these two flexible architectures. It then systematically elucidates five core sensing mechanisms-capacitive, piezoresistive, triboelectric, piezoelectric, and electromagnetic-comparing their working principles, material systems, structural designs, and performance metrics. Among these, piezoelectric and triboelectric types exhibit distinctive advantages in self-powering capability, whereas resistive and capacitive approaches offer greater ease of integration. Furthermore, the applications of intrinsically flexible acceleration sensors in structural health monitoring, wearable devices, automotive safety, and other fields are discussed, with particular emphasis on their unique strengths in real-time vibration monitoring. Finally, the review summarizes existing challenges, such as the trade-off between sensitivity and flexibility, and provides theoretical insights to guide future innovations in intrinsically flexible acceleration sensor technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.