Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076601›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Improving the Robustness of Odour Recognition with Odour-Image Data Fusion in Open-Air Settings.

Fanny Monori, Alin Tisan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fanny MonoriDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-3321
Alin TisanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-2722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odour recognition with low-cost gas sensors is challenging in open-air settings due to the non-specificity of the sensors and environmental variability. This can be mitigated by incorporating additional information into the classification process. This paper investigates odour-image multimodality in two case-studies of increasing complexity: banana ripening in open-air environment and strawberry ripening in a glasshouse environment. Data were collected using custom acquisition platforms equipped with cameras and MOX gas sensors operated with temperature modulation. For the visual modality, image classification (MobileNetV3) and object detection (YoloV5) models are trained. For the odour modality, established classical machine learning methods (Random Forest, XGBoost, SVM and Logistic Regression) and neural networks (1D-CNN, LSTM, MLP, and ELM) are employed. Each modality is analysed independently and together to critically assess scenarios in which combining modalities provides a clear advantage over using either modality alone. Results show that models trained on odour data achieve high accuracy in controlled environments but underperform in more dynamic open-air settings. Image-based models are sensitive to the image quality in all environments; however, they are more robust when deployed in different environments. Lastly, it is demonstrated that decision fusion consistently increases the accuracy, by as much as +12.36% in the banana ripening and +3.63% in the strawberry ripening scenario. Where decision fusion does not improve classification accuracy significantly, it is shown that the multimodal approach can still be leveraged to identify high-confidence predictions by selecting samples where both modalities agree on the label.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedOdorantsClassification AlgorithmsFragariaFruitMachine LearningMusaNeural Networks, ComputerRandom Forestdecision fusionfruit ripeninggas sensorsimage classificationmultimodalityodour recognition

Identifiers

PMID42076601
PMCPMC13120241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.