ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive Peen Forming: Sensing Architectures, Learning Models, and Closed-Loop Smart Manufacturing.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peen forming is a dieless manufacturing process used to shape large, thin aerospace panels through controlled shot impacts that induce residual stresses and curvature. Despite long-standing industrial use, process monitoring still depends largely on indirect proxies such as Almen intensity and coverage, limiting spatially resolved deformation assessment and hindering closed-loop control. In parallel, vision-based artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled adaptive monitoring and feedback in smart-manufacturing domains such as welding, additive manufacturing, and sheet forming. This review examines how such sensing and learning strategies can be transferred to adaptive peening forming. We compare six vision sensing modalities and assess major AI model families for surface mapping, temporal prediction, robustness, and deployment maturity. The synthesis shows that progress is primarily constrained by limited validated datasets, harsh in-cabinet sensing conditions, scarce closed-loop demonstrations, and weak validation on curved aerospace geometries. We conclude that the sensing and AI foundations for adaptive peen forming are already emerging, but industrial translation now depends on stronger experimental validation, standardized benchmarking, robust multi-sensor integration, and edge-capable feedback pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.