ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Preliminary Study on Piezoelectric Sensor Signals Embedded in Polymeric Samples.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Piezoelectric sensors are widely used for force and vibration monitoring in both rigid and flexible structures, yet their performance can be significantly affected by how they are integrated into the host material. Challenges such as limited sensitivity, inconsistent signal transmission, and delays in response remain particularly relevant in flexible components produced by additive manufacturing. Addressing these limitations requires a better understanding of how integration strategies influence sensor behavior. This study presents preliminary experimental results on the performance of commercial piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) sensors embedded in flexible structures fabricated by additive manufacturing (3D printing). Although the current investigation did not assess variability from mass production, repeated testing of each specimen was performed to reduce this potential error. Filaflex Foamy 95A polyurethane (TPU) samples were produced using Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technology in two configurations: with and without a cavity for sensor fitting. A minimum of seven valid compression tests, at each condition, were performed, with ten loading and unloading cycles up to 1000 N of force, using an indentation rate of 0.5 mm/s. In most tests, the two configurations showed different peak amplitudes throughout the cycles. Samples with the sensor embedded in the cavity consistently reached peak signal amplitudes more rapidly. In contrast, samples with the sensor positioned on the material surface without a fitting exhibited similar results across all tests and demonstrated a broader signal distribution over time. These findings indicate that the sensor-integration strategy is the primary factor influencing dynamic force transfer, impact sensitivity, piezoelectric response time, and maximum signal magnitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.