ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating and Classifying Gentleness in VR-Based Surgical Simulation: A VR + fNIRS Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gentleness, defined as the ability to handle tissues delicately while minimizing unnecessary force, is a critical indicator of surgical proficiency. Objective and real-time assessment of gentleness in virtual reality (VR)-based training can improve the understanding of both psychomotor and cognitive components of surgical skill. This study evaluates and classifies participants' gentleness during VR-based laparoscopic simulations using fNIRS-derived hemodynamic features. Twenty-three volunteers with no prior laparoscopic experience performed a VR-based double-grasper task while hemodynamic activity over frontal and motor cortical regions was recorded using eighteen fNIRS channels. In parallel, subjective workload (NASA-TLX), error counts, and gentleness performance score (GPS) were collected. Temporal features, including slope, root mean square, and standard deviation, were extracted from the fNIRS signals and used to train multiple machine learning classifiers. Performance labels were binarized into low and high groups using median splits of the gentleness performance score. Models were evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Results revealed stronger right-frontal HbO activity and increased left-motor HbR responses in the low-performance group, suggesting higher cognitive effort and less efficient motor strategies. Across classifiers, slope-based features consistently outperformed variability- and amplitude-based metrics. The highest classification performance was achieved using HbR slope features with Random Forest classifiers (accuracy ≈ 0.85, AUC up to 0.93). These findings highlight the potential of fNIRS-based metrics for automated performance assessment in VR surgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.