Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076496›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Evaluating and Classifying Gentleness in VR-Based Surgical Simulation: A VR + fNIRS Study.

Suveyda Sanli, Hasan Onur Keles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suveyda SanliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0005-0705-8189
Hasan Onur KelesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8493-2582

Funding

Health Institutes of Türkiye , 2023-B-01-33153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gentleness, defined as the ability to handle tissues delicately while minimizing unnecessary force, is a critical indicator of surgical proficiency. Objective and real-time assessment of gentleness in virtual reality (VR)-based training can improve the understanding of both psychomotor and cognitive components of surgical skill. This study evaluates and classifies participants' gentleness during VR-based laparoscopic simulations using fNIRS-derived hemodynamic features. Twenty-three volunteers with no prior laparoscopic experience performed a VR-based double-grasper task while hemodynamic activity over frontal and motor cortical regions was recorded using eighteen fNIRS channels. In parallel, subjective workload (NASA-TLX), error counts, and gentleness performance score (GPS) were collected. Temporal features, including slope, root mean square, and standard deviation, were extracted from the fNIRS signals and used to train multiple machine learning classifiers. Performance labels were binarized into low and high groups using median splits of the gentleness performance score. Models were evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Results revealed stronger right-frontal HbO activity and increased left-motor HbR responses in the low-performance group, suggesting higher cognitive effort and less efficient motor strategies. Across classifiers, slope-based features consistently outperformed variability- and amplitude-based metrics. The highest classification performance was achieved using HbR slope features with Random Forest classifiers (accuracy ≈ 0.85, AUC up to 0.93). These findings highlight the potential of fNIRS-based metrics for automated performance assessment in VR surgical training.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHemodynamicsHumansLaparoscopyMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredfNIRSgentlenessskill assessmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42076496
PMCPMC13119916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.