ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Assessing the Resilience of sEMG Classifiers to Sensor Malfunction and Signal Saturation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is widely used for gesture recognition, yet the way classic feature-classifier pipelines fail under realistic signal degradations is still poorly quantified. Existing studies typically report accuracy on clean laboratory data, leaving open how amplitude saturation and channel dropout jointly affect different feature combinations, classifiers, and subjects. In this work, we provide, to our knowledge, the first systematic robustness map of a conventional sEMG pipeline under controlledclipping and single-sensor failure. sEMG from nine subjects performing a multi-session, multi-gesture protocol is windowed (250 ms, 50 ms hop) and represented using four common time-domain features (Root Mean Square, Variance, Zero Crossing, and Waveform Length). We exhaustively evaluated single features and all pairwise fusions with three standard classifiers (Support Vector Machine (RBF kernel), Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Random Forest) over (i) a sweep of symmetric saturation thresholds (10-6-10-1) and (ii) five single-channel dropout scenarios, reporting subject-wise dispersion rather than aggregate scores alone. This design enables explicit characterization of the following: (1) accuracy recovery as clipping weakens for each feature pair; (2) dependency of robustness on which channel fails; and (3) differences among Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Random Forest under identical degradations. The results show that lightweight feature pairs (Root Mean Square + Waveform Length, Variance + Zero Crossing, and Waveform Length + Zero Crossing) coupled with Random Forest form a consistently robust operating point, with performance recovering as clipping weakens and remaining resilient under single-channel dropout. Beyond robustness, the conventional pipeline trains substantially faster than representative deep learning baselines under a unified end-to-end timing definition, supporting real-time recalibration and repeated robustness sweeps in wearable deployments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.