Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076488›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Vision Language-Based Framework for Detecting Industrial Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Assets Using Unlabelled Data.

Masoud Kamali, Behnam Atazadeh, Abbas Rajabifard, Yiqun Chen, Ensiyeh Javaherian Pour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masoud KamaliThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-3354
Behnam AtazadehThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9295-4220
Abbas RajabifardThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-3173
Yiqun ChenThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-9217
Ensiyeh Javaherian PourThe Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE220100094Australian Research Council IH210100048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been significant advancements in object detection using extensive labelled datasets. However, existing learning-based approaches remain constrained in industrial environments, primarily due to the limited diversity in training datasets; the lack of generalisation of close-set detectors to unseen asset categories; and the inherent spatial and geometric complexity of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) assets. To address this challenge, we propose a new approach that leverages pre-trained vision language models and close-set object detectors to detect unseen MEP assets using unlabelled data. Experimental results reveal the superior performance of Grounding DINO using Swin B transformer in open-vocabulary MEP asset detection, achieving the mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.6586 for valve detection and 0.4883 for pump detection. In addition, the combination of Grounding DINO (Swin B) and YOLOv8 outperforms other configurations in MEP asset detection, attaining the highest performance for both valve detection, with mean average precision at IoU = 0.5 (mAP50) of 0.928 and mean average precision over IoU threshold from 0.5 to 0.95 (mAP50:95) of 0.889, and pump detection, with corresponding values of 0.778 and 0.662, respectively. The quantitative and qualitative results of our approach were evaluated against fine-tuned Grounding DINO and fully supervised close-set object detectors.

Indexed as

close-set object detectorsMEP assetsopen-vocabulary object detectionvision language models

Identifiers

PMID42076488
PMCPMC13120104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.