Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076470›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Novel Method for Motion Blur Detection and Quantification Using Signal Analysis on a Controlled Empirical Image Dataset.

Woottichai Nonsakhoo, Saiyan Saiyod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Woottichai NonsakhooHardware-Human Interface and Communications Laboratory (H2I-Comm Lab), Department of Computer Science, College of Computing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0004-8824-4014
Saiyan SaiyodHardware-Human Interface and Communications Laboratory (H2I-Comm Lab), Department of Computer Science, College of Computing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-6572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion blur degrades single-frame imaging when relative motion occurs during sensor exposure; yet, quantitative validation is difficult because ground-truth motion parameters are rarely available in real images. This paper presents an interpretable, measure-first framework for detecting, localizing, and quantifying motion blur in single-frame grayscale images under a validated operating condition of one-dimensional horizontal uniform motion. The method analyzes each image row as a one-dimensional spatial signal, where Movement Artifact denotes the scanline-level imprint of motion blur retained in the legacy algorithm names MAPE and MAQ. The pipeline combines three stages: Movement Artifact Position Estimation (MAPE) using scanline self-similarity, Reference Origin Point Estimation (ROPE) using robust structural trends, and Movement Artifact Quantification (MAQ), which summarizes blur magnitude as an average horizontal spatial displacement after adaptive filtering. The pipeline is evaluated on a controlled empirical dataset of 110 images of a high-contrast marker acquired at known tangential velocities from 0.0 to 1.0 m/s in 0.1 m/s increments (10 images per level). MAPE achieves 70-90% detection rates across velocities, and ROPE localizes reference origins with 97-99% detection. An empirical polynomial mapping from MAQ to velocity attains

Indexed as

controlled empirical datasetmotion blurmotion blur quantificationmovement artifactpolynomial regressionreference origin estimationscanline analysisself-similarityvelocity estimation

Identifiers

PMID42076470
PMCPMC13119698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.