ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Narrative Review of AI Frameworks for Chronic Stress Detection Using Physiological Sensing: Resting, Longitudinal, and Reactivity Perspectives.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic stress is a time-dependent condition characterized by sustained dysregulation across neural, autonomic, and endocrine systems, with important consequences for both health and socioeconomic outcomes. Unlike acute stress, which is typically characterized by short-lived physiological activation, chronic stress reflects an accumulated allostatic load and a longer-term recalibration of stress response systems. Recent advances in physiological sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) have supported the development of computational approaches for chronic stress detection using electroencephalography (EEG), heart rate variability (HRV), photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), and wearable multimodal platforms. This narrative review examines current AI-based studies through three main inferential paradigms: resting baseline dysregulation, longitudinal physiological monitoring, and reactivity-based inference. Across modalities, classical machine learning (ML) methods, particularly support vector machines (SVMs) and tree-based ensembles, remain the most commonly used approaches, largely because available datasets are small and most pipelines still depend on engineered features. Deep learning (DL) methods are beginning to emerge, but their use remains constrained by the lack of large, standardized, longitudinal datasets specifically designed for chronic stress research. Major challenges include ambiguity in stress labeling, limited longitudinal validation, circadian confounding, inter-individual variability, and small cohort sizes. Future progress will depend on standardized datasets, biologically grounded multimodal integration, hybrid baseline-reactivity modeling, adaptive personalization, and more interpretable AI systems. Greater emphasis is also needed on clinical relevance and generalizability if AI-based chronic stress monitoring is to move beyond experimental settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.