Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076451›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

LiDAR-Based Road Surface Damage Classification: A Survey.

Trevor Greene, Meisam Shayegh Moradi, Muhammad Umair, Nafiul Nawjis, Naima Kaabouch, Timothy Pasch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trevor GreeneArtificial Intelligence Research (AIR) Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3286-7096
Meisam Shayegh MoradiArtificial Intelligence Research (AIR) Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0100-9478
Muhammad UmairArtificial Intelligence Research (AIR) Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7113-1337
Nafiul NawjisArtificial Intelligence Research (AIR) Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Naima KaabouchArtificial Intelligence Research (AIR) Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.
Timothy PaschCommunications Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-8942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike image-only systems that falter in shadows, glare, and low contrast, LiDAR directly records surface geometry and supports depth-aware quantification. This survey examines LiDAR-based road surface damage classification across the entire pipeline, encompassing acquisition with mobile and terrestrial laser scanning, preprocessing and representation choices, supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised learning techniques, as well as multisensor fusion at early, mid, and late stages. A consistent thread is measurement, not just detection: we describe how LiDAR damage classification maps to agency practices such as the Distress Identification Manual and the Pavement Condition Index. We summarize datasets and evaluation protocols for detection, segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and ride quality. We outline practical concerns for corridor-scale deployment: calibration and timing, intensity normalization, tiling/streaming, and runtime budgeting. The review concludes with open problems and outlines directions for robust, severity-aware, and scalable field systems.

Indexed as

LiDARmobile laser scanningpavement distresspoint cloudsroad surface damagesurvey

Identifiers

PMID42076451
PMCPMC13120083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.