ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
LiDAR-Based Road Surface Damage Classification: A Survey.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike image-only systems that falter in shadows, glare, and low contrast, LiDAR directly records surface geometry and supports depth-aware quantification. This survey examines LiDAR-based road surface damage classification across the entire pipeline, encompassing acquisition with mobile and terrestrial laser scanning, preprocessing and representation choices, supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised learning techniques, as well as multisensor fusion at early, mid, and late stages. A consistent thread is measurement, not just detection: we describe how LiDAR damage classification maps to agency practices such as the Distress Identification Manual and the Pavement Condition Index. We summarize datasets and evaluation protocols for detection, segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and ride quality. We outline practical concerns for corridor-scale deployment: calibration and timing, intensity normalization, tiling/streaming, and runtime budgeting. The review concludes with open problems and outlines directions for robust, severity-aware, and scalable field systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.