ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Evaluation of a Data Glove-Based System for Assisting Puzzle Solving.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many hands-on tasks remain difficult to fully automate because they require human dexterity and flexible object handling. Data gloves offer a promising interface for sensing hand-object interactions, but most prior systems focus on gesture recognition or object classification rather than closed-loop, step-by-step task guidance. In this work, we develop and evaluate a tactile-sensing operation support system using an e-textile data glove with 88 pressure sensors, a tactile pressure sheet for placement verification, and a GUI that provides step-by-step instructions. As a core component, a CNN classifies the grasped state as bare hand or one of four discs with 93.3% accuracy using 16,175 training samples collected from five participants. In a user study on the Tower of Hanoi task as a controlled proxy for multi-step manipulation, the system reduced mean solving time by 51.5% (from 242.6 s to 117.8 s), reduced the number of disc movements (35.4 to 15, about 20 fewer moves on average), and lowered perceived workload (NASA-TLX) by 53.1% (from 68.5 to 32.1), while achieving a SUS score of 75. These results demonstrate the feasibility of tactile-based step verification and guidance in a controlled multi-step task; broader generalization requires evaluation with larger and more diverse participant groups and tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.