ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Shapelet Transform-Based Method for Structural Damage Identification: A Case Study on a Wooden Truss Bridge.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of environmental disturbances and sensor deployment variations on damage identification represents a critical bottleneck that constrains the practical effectiveness of structural health monitoring. Existing methods addressing these challenges often suffer from poor interpretability due to information loss during feature extraction or exhibit insufficient sensitivity in identifying early-stage minor damage. This paper proposes a damage identification method based on the Shapelet Transform and Random Forest classifier, which extracts highly interpretable local shape features from vibration response signals to achieve robust identification of structural state changes. The study utilizes measured random vibration response data from a timber truss bridge. The dataset comprises four reference states collected on different dates and five damage states simulated by additional masses ranging from +23.5 g to +193.7 g, with sensors deployed in both vertical and horizontal directions. The Shapelet Transform selects local subsequences with high information gain from the original time series as features, which are subsequently classified using the Random Forest algorithm. The experimental design systematically investigates the influence of different damage severities, sensor locations, and environmental variations on method performance. The results demonstrate that with a Shapelet extraction time of 10 min, the method achieves 100% identification accuracy across multiple operating conditions comprehensively considering environmental variations, sensor location differences, and varying damage severities. When the extraction time is reduced to 5 min, 3 min, and 1 min, the average accuracies are 93.98%, 89.51%, and 58.48%, respectively. The method effectively identifies the minimum simulated damage (+23.5 g), which represents only 0.07% of the total structural mass, while maintaining stable performance under varying sensor locations and environmental conditions. Compared to traditional methods based on global frequency-domain features or statistical characteristics, the proposed method extracts physically meaningful local Shapelet features, offering significant advantages in interpretability. In contrast to deep learning approaches, this method demonstrates greater robustness under limited sample conditions. This study confirms that the combined framework of the Shapelet Transform and Random Forest can effectively address multiple real-world challenges in structural health monitoring, delivering high accuracy, strong robustness, and excellent interpretability, thereby providing a novel approach for developing practical real-time damage identification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.