ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Unified AI-Driven Multimodal Framework Integrating Visual Sensing and Wearable Sensors for Robust Human Motion Monitoring in Biomedical Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a unified multimodal temporal motion state perception framework for optical imaging-oriented biomedical applications, integrating visual skeleton sequences, inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals, and surface electromyography (EMG) signals. The framework utilizes modality-specific encoders and a cross-modal temporal alignment attention mechanism to explicitly model temporal offsets from heterogeneous sensing streams. A multimodal temporal Transformer backbone is introduced to capture long-range motion dependencies and cross-modal interactions, while an uncertainty-aware fusion module dynamically allocates weights based on modality confidence. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves an accuracy of 94.37%, an F1-score of 93.95%, and a mean average precision of 96.02%, outperforming mainstream baseline models. Robustness evaluations further confirm stable performance under visual occlusion and sensor noise. These results indicate that the framework provides a highly accurate and robust solution for rehabilitation assessment, sports training monitoring, and wearable intelligent interaction systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.