ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Field Evaluation of Temperature and Wind-Speed Sensor Performance Under Natural Icing Conditions for Power Meteorological Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro-meteorological monitoring systems have been widely deployed in power grids, providing essential data to support the prevention and mitigation of ice- and wind-related disasters. However, understanding of the associated error mechanisms and quantitative evaluations under freezing rain and snow remains limited, particularly in complex field environments. This study presents a field-based quantitative assessment of two key variables, air temperature and wind speed, based on comparative observations collected over multiple winter icing cycles. We analyze the coupled effects of low temperature, ice accretion, and solar radiation on temperature measurements through multi-configuration sensor comparison, and characterize the dynamic response of cup anemometers under icing conditions using cross-correlation lag analysis. Results show that temperature error is dominated by sensor installation configuration and solar radiation. Under weak solar radiation, unshielded sensors tend to record lower temperatures than a standard Stevenson screen, but once radiation exceeds 200 W/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.