ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Analysis of Chip Electronic Components' Typical Yield in Taping Process Based on Virtual Metrology.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses virtual metrology (VM) for the taping process of chip electronic components, in which partial observability, unmeasured disturbances, and severe label imbalance make direct batch-wise yield prediction unstable. Rather than proposing a new standalone learning algorithm, we develop a data-centric VM framework that reformulates the task as the prediction of operating-condition-level typical yield. First, physically relevant features are retained based on process knowledge and analyzed using Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and mutual information. We then perform multidimensional equal-frequency binning to partition the observable feature space into locally homogeneous operating condition groups, and define the within-bin median yield as the typical yield, thereby constructing an operating condition dictionary. Based on this dictionary-based representation, low-yield-oriented sample weighting is combined with nested cross-validation and Bayesian optimization for model comparison and hyperparameter tuning. Using desensitized production data from an electronic component taping process, the results under this representation show more stable prediction than direct modeling on unbinned batch samples while also improving tail-oriented fitting relative to unweighted baselines. These findings suggest that, for partially observable manufacturing data, operating condition stratification provides a practical basis for stabilizing VM prediction, while low-yield-oriented sample weighting further improves sensitivity to the low-yield tail, supporting picture yield early warning and process-level decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.