Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076373›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Bond Strength of Pretreated SFRC CAD/CAM Blocks: Comparison of Two SBS Test Methods.

Deniz Mizrak, Sufyan Garoushi, Pekka K Vallittu, Mine Betul Uctasli, Lippo Lassila

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deniz MizrakDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cankiri Karatekin, 18100 Cankiri, Turkey.
Sufyan GaroushiDepartment of Biomaterials Science, Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-2314
Pekka K VallittuDepartment of Biomaterials Science, Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Mine Betul UctasliDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, 06490 Ankara, Turkey.
Lippo LassilaDepartment of Biomaterials Science, Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1575-2083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliability of adhesive bonding to CAD/CAM resin composites is influenced not only by material composition and surface treatment but also by the testing methodology used to assess bond strength. However, the impact of different shear bond strength (SBS) test configurations remains insufficiently clarified. This study evaluated the influence of different surface pretreatment protocols and SBS test methods on the bonding performance of a self-adhesive resin cement to two CAD/CAM materials: a conventional particulate-filled composite (Cerasmart 270) and an experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC CAD). Specimens (14 × 12 × 3 mm;

Indexed as

CAD-CAMcomposite resinsfiber-reinforced materialsshear strengthsurface treatment

Identifiers

PMID42076373
PMCPMC13120386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.