Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076372›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Co-Pyrolysis of Polyolefins and Silicone Rubber: Effects on Mass Balancing, Product Distribution, and Potential Siloxane Recovery.

Lukas Eigenschink, Wolfgang Eder, Matthias Mastalir, Michael Harasek, Christian Paulik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukas EigenschinkInstitute for Chemical Technology of Organic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
Wolfgang EderOMV Downstream GmbH, Mannswörther Straße 28, 2320 Schwechat, Austria.
Matthias MastalirOMV Downstream GmbH, Mannswörther Straße 28, 2320 Schwechat, Austria.
Michael HarasekInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-5840
Christian PaulikInstitute for Chemical Technology of Organic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1177-1527

Funding

OMV Downstream GmbH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-pyrolysis of polyolefins (LDPE, PP, PS) mixed with silicone rubber (SR) was investigated using a laboratory-scale pyrolysis apparatus to evaluate product composition, synergistic interactions, and siloxane recovery potential. Synergistic effects were assessed by comparing experimental mass balances and product distributions with calculated values derived from individual polymer pyrolysis. Co-pyrolysis resulted in a reduction in liquid yield and an increase in gaseous products and solid residue compared to calculated values, with liquid yields decreasing by up to ≈15 wt% at high SR content. This shift was accompanied by an enrichment in lighter hydrocarbons in both phases, reaching up to a ≈18% relative increase at high SR content, and by a redistribution towards smaller cyclic siloxanes. Chromatographic analysis confirmed that no new compounds were formed, but the proportion of low molecular weight species increased with silicone content. These effects are attributed to the distinct thermal behavior of the polymers, as silicone rubber does not melt but becomes brittle, allowing molten polyolefins to infiltrate surface cracks and prolong residence time, thereby promoting secondary cracking. Furthermore, recovery of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D

Indexed as

chemical recyclingco-pyrolysispolyolefinssilicone rubber

Identifiers

PMID42076372
PMCPMC13120016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.