ArticlePolymers2026
Mechanical Performance and Artificial Aging Behavior of Reinforced 3D-Printed PLA Structures for Drone Arm Application.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses several key limitations identified in previous research on additively manufactured PLA composites. Unlike most earlier studies that focused primarily on the characterization of as-printed materials, the present work systematically investigates both mechanical and surface behavior before, during, and after artificial aging. In addition, six different printing configurations and reinforcement types (PVC and fiberglass mesh) were analyzed under controlled conditions, enabling a more reliable assessment of their combined influence on composite performance. Printed specimens were artificially aged for 45 and 90 days. The aging protocol combined cyclic changes in moisture, temperature, UV, and IR agents, trying to mimic real exploitation conditions as realistically as possible. The chemical and surface changes during aging were tracked using FTIR spectroscopy, colorimetry, contact angle, and surface free energy measurements. Mechanical performance at 0, 45, and 90 days was evaluated through tensile, three-point bending, and Charpy impact tests, as well as full-scale cantilever loading tests of real printed drone arms. Results show that artificial aging causes measurable chemical and surface modifications, as indicated by changes in the FTIR degradation index and surface wettability. However, these changes do not result in severe mechanical degradation within the investigated aging period. Reinforcement in the form of incorporated PVC and fiberglass mesh significantly affected failure behavior. Specimens printed with higher infill density and thicker infill lines generally exhibit improved mechanical properties. Specimens stiffness and impact resistance were also altered. Results demonstrate that reinforced PLA structures are suitable for lightweight drone applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.