ArticlePolymers2026
A Hybrid Clustering-Classification Approach for Predicting Strength and Analyzing Material Composition of Geopolymers.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of geopolymers as sustainable alternative binders has been accelerated by the environmental requirement to reduce the carbon footprint of cement. However, predicting their key properties, such as compressive strength, from their complex chemical composition remains a significant challenge. Although mixture ratios prepared on a macro-scale are widely used for quality control purposes, they do not account for the chemical structure, despite this having a direct impact on the materials' structural properties. Predicting fundamental properties such as compressive strength from complex chemical compositions remains a significant challenge due to the nonlinear relationships between the elemental components. This research paper introduces a tailored hybrid machine learning framework that combines K-means clustering with classification algorithms. The method uses energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) data to classify geopolymer samples into their specific mixture numbers, which allows scientists to predict material properties through compositional analysis. A new dataset featuring the elemental compositions of Si, Al, Na, Ca, O, and C, as well as the critical ratios of Si/Al and Ca/Si, was analyzed. The initial step involved clustering the data to discover natural compositional clusters, which served as the basis for training and testing five different classifiers, which included Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), LightGBM, Naive Bayes (NB), and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The consequences proved that the hybrid method worked with outstanding efficiency. RF achieved the highest performance results through its 98% accuracy, 96% recall, 94% precision, and 95% F1-score results when it classified samples according to their clustered groups. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and permutation feature importance analyses both showed that Si/Al proportion functioned as the most crucial predictive variable, while oxygen (O) content and silicon (Si) content followed in importance. The K-means cluster labels produced high accuracy results because they demonstrated that compositional data had strong natural groups, which matched the target property. The system delivers an efficient method which enables fast and dependable geopolymer property forecasts through direct analysis of chemical composition with chemical composition analysis, thus delivering essential information to enhance mix design processes and boost sustainable building material production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.