ArticlePolymers2026
Fracture and Fatigue Assessment of Bonded Composite Patch Repairs in Notched and Cracked Plates.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a unified mechanics-based framework for evaluating bonded composite patch repairs. Discrete fracture, fatigue, and adhesive responses are transformed into continuous master equations over the design space. Low-order polynomial surfaces model stress intensity and concentration responses, enabling continuous prediction of repair performance without repeated finite-element analyses. A fracture-based repair efficiency index is derived from the analytical master surface. This index quantifies the average reduction in crack-driving force across the domain. Combined with adhesive stiffness and strength, it defines an adhesive-based repair efficiency index (A-REI), providing a direct link between structural response and material properties. The results show that repair effectiveness is strongly influenced by both geometric severity and adhesive properties. Fatigue performance decreases significantly with increasing notch ratio in single-sided repairs. Double-sided configurations maintain consistently higher efficiency. Symmetric reinforcement more effectively reduces stress concentration, with improvements exceeding 40% at intermediate notch ratios. Adhesive selection is governed by stiffness and strength. Structural adhesives achieve significantly higher A-REI values, whereas compliant adhesives contribute negligibly. Overall, repair symmetry controls the magnitude of improvement, while adhesive properties determine performance ranking. This framework provides a clear, practical basis for design and material selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.