ArticleMicromachines2026
Deep Learning-Based Prediction and Compensation of Performance Degradation in Flexible Sensors.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible deformation sensors inevitably suffer from sensitivity degradation and severe measurement errors during long-term cyclic stretching due to structural fatigue. Traditional material-level optimizations are costly and lack dynamic adaptability. Herein, we propose an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven predict-and-compensate framework for the online calibration of flexible sensors. To overcome training sample scarcity, a generative adversarial network (GAN) performs temporal data augmentation. Subsequently, a hybrid deep learning framework integrating long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and a Sequence Attention mechanism is employed. This architecture accurately captures both local signal fluctuations and multiscale long-term decay trends, enabling precise multi-step prediction and output compensation. Experimental evaluations validate that this strategy significantly suppresses sensor response drift. Under cyclic loading, an initially substantial relative measurement error of 48.63% plummets to 7.16% post-calibration, with typical errors consistently reduced to the ~1% level. Furthermore, when deployed in a smart glove gesture recognition system, this method successfully restores the recognition accuracy from a fatigue-induced low of 75.73% (after 200 stretch cycles) back to 97.70%. This generative and attention-based deep learning paradigm offers robust, real-time error calibration, providing a highly viable solution for extending the long-term reliability and stability of flexible sensor systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.