ArticleMicromachines2026
Modelling Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in the Optimisation of Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) Processes.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoimprint lithography (NIL) plays an increasingly important role in modern nanomanufacturing processes, but its effective application in production conditions requires precise tools for evaluating and optimising technological processes. The aim of the study was to develop and model key performance indicators (KPIs) supporting the optimisation of the quality, stability and efficiency of nanoimprint lithography processes. As part of the selection of indicators, a literature review, surveys and in-depth interviews with industry experts were conducted, which enabled the identification of indicators relevant from a technological practice perspective. The proposed KPI classification was directly linked to the stages of the NIL process, creating a basis for operational performance control and process capability analysis. A novel aspect is the proposal of an integrated KPI model that combines the classification of indicators based on the stages of the NIL process with their direct link to technological parameters and measurable quality effects. These indicators have been linked to critical process parameters for different NIL variants, including Thermal NIL, UV-NIL, Roll-to-Roll NIL and Step-and-Repeat NIL, using a process analysis and multi-criteria optimisation approach. Research indicates that the use of an integrated KPI model improves the accuracy of nanostructure mapping, reduced defect density, and increased process efficiency without compromising technological stability. The proposed approach is a universal tool supporting NIL process control, its scaling to industrial applications, and integration with statistical process control and data-driven optimisation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.