ArticleMicromachines2026
Multiscale Analysis of Size-Dependent Vibration of Graphene Nanoelectromechanical Resonators.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The size-dependent out-of-plane vibrational behavior of graphene-based nanoelectromechanical (NEMS) resonators is investigated using a molecular mechanics (MM) finite element approach. Each carbon-carbon (C-C) bond is modeled as an Euler-Bernoulli beam element, with the bending stiffness derived from the bond-angle potential, yielding an equivalent plate flexural rigidity D = (√3/6) kθ. The natural frequencies of the first four vibration modes are computed for square graphene sheets of increasing size with both zigzag (ZZ) and armchair (AC) chirality configurations under simply supported boundary conditions on all four edges. A chirality-induced frequency deviation δ(L) is defined to quantify the difference between ZZ and AC results, and a threshold size L* is identified as the sheet size at which δ falls below 1%. For mode 1, the threshold is L* = 18.5 nm; the values increase monotonically to 24.5 nm, 28.0 nm, and 31.5 nm for modes 2 through 4, indicating that higher modes require larger sheet dimensions before continuum plate theory becomes reliable. A dimensionless frequency parameter Ω = f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.