ArticleMicromachines2026
Mechanism of Tungsten Film Adhesion Enhancement on Alumina Ceramics via Microgroove Spacing During Multi-Abrasive Scratching.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the high-temperature deposition of tungsten thin films on alumina ceramic substrates, the inherent mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients frequently triggers interfacial delamination, where uncontrollable factors in stochastic surface topographies can exacerbate localized stress concentrations. To resolve these interfacial failures, the enhancement of interfacial adhesion through a deterministic surface microgroove design is identified as the general objective of the present research. Within this framework, the establishment of a robust quantitative mapping between the transverse scratching offset distances and the resultant periodic microgeometry is first pursued as a specific experimental objective. This methodological approach effectively transforms the stochastic nature of the substrate into deterministic geometric configurations. Second, a specific numerical objective is fulfilled by evaluating the interfacial stress redistribution and damage evolution utilizing refined thermomechanical coupled simulations based on the cohesive zone model. The integrated findings demonstrate that optimizing the microgroove spacing effectively governs the morphological transition and broadens stress diffusion pathways to mitigate thermal mismatch effects. Specifically, the structural optimization at a spacing of 28.8 µm facilitates an approximately 31.8% reduction in the maximum interfacial stress and a 10% decrease in the average film stress compared to the 13.6 µm spacing. Finally, this research clarifies the underlying mechanisms of stress buffering and provides a rigorous engineering methodology for the structural design of reliable high-performance ceramic-metal interfaces in extreme environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.