ArticleMicromachines2026
Kinetostatic Modeling and Performance Analysis of a Symmetric Redundant-Actuated 4-PSS Compliant Parallel Micro-Motion Mechanism.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A symmetric redundant-actuated 4-PSS compliant parallel micro-motion mechanism is proposed to meet the high requirements for stiffness and motion precision in micro-nano manipulation. First, the screw theory is employed to confirm that the mechanism possesses spatial three translational (3T) degrees of freedom along the X, Y and Z axes. On this basis, the global compliance model of the mechanism is constructed by combining the compliance matrix method with coordinate transformation technology, and the kinetostatic model reflecting the mapping relationship between input force/displacement and output displacement is further derived. The finite element analysis (FEA) is used to verify the kinetostatic model, and the results show that under the predefined spiral trajectory, the maximum absolute error between the theoretical calculation and the simulation result is less than 6 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.