Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076212›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2026

3D-Printed Closed-Channel Spiral Inertial Microfluidic Device for Size-Based Particle Separation.

Eda Ozyilmaz, Gamze Gediz Ilis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eda OzyilmazDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli 41400, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6099-8496
Gamze Gediz IlisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli 41400, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8366-5427

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) 1059B142301021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiral inertial microfluidic devices provide a simple, high-throughput approach for size-based particle separation; however, translating PDMS-optimized designs into monolithic, fully enclosed 3D-printed channels is often limited by printability and post-print channel clearing. In our previous PDMS study, a 400×120µm spiral achieved high separation performance after computational optimization and experimental validation. To translate this high-performing PDMS concept into a faster and more cost-effective manufacturing approach, the same separation principle is transferred to a fully 3D-printed, closed-channel spiral device, and the geometry is re-optimized around manufacturability constraints. Printing trials showed that enclosed channels at 400×120µm and 600×180µm could not be cleared reliably due to trapped resin and frequent blockage, most often near the inner-outlet region. In contrast, 800×240µm and 1200×360µm channels were printed and flushed successfully, and 800×240µm was selected as the smallest reproducibly functional cross-section. Particle-tracking simulations were then used to re-optimize spiral development length, showing that a 4-turn device provides limited collection for 12µm targets (10%), intermediate lengths (5-7 turns) improve collection to 50%, and an 8-turn spiral achieves complete large-particle collection (100%) across tested target sizes (12-24µm) while reducing small-particle crossover. Experimental validation of the 8-turn 800×240µm device at Q=6mL min-1 using fluorescent polystyrene particles (18µm target; 6µm background) yielded an average collection efficiency of 84% and an inner-outlet purity of 92%. Overall, these results demonstrate that spiral inertial separation can be retained in a monolithic 3D-printed format when the design is re-optimized around the smallest reliably clearable enclosed cross-section and sufficient spiral development length.

Indexed as

3D printingclosed-channel microfluidicsinertial microfluidicsmicrofluidicparticle separationspiral microchannels

Identifiers

PMID42076212
PMCPMC13117839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.