ArticleMicromachines2026
Microneedle-Based Analysis Reveals Polarity-Dependent Spatial Regulation of Macrophage Phagocytosis.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phagocytosis and migration in macrophages share key regulators, including Rho family GTPases; however, whether phagocytic membrane extension generates a transient, whole-cell polarity that coordinates migration and spatial prioritization of engulfment remains unclear. Here, we investigated the spatiotemporal coupling between membrane extension and cell migration using opsonized microneedles, which enable controlled stimulation together with long-range membrane extension and backtracking dynamics. During single-needle stimulation, membrane extension was tightly coupled to directional migration, whereas membrane retraction showed weaker coupling. In sequential stimulation with two microneedles, ongoing phagocytosis suppressed competing membrane extension at spatially opposite locations, and a reversal in migration direction was accompanied by initiation of membrane extension toward the second needle. Third-needle experiments further revealed a polarized spatial distribution of phagocytic responsiveness across the cell surface. Consistently, uniform stimulation with multiple opsonized microbeads demonstrated sequential, one-at-a-time engulfment even under near-simultaneous target attachment. These results support a model in which phagocytic membrane extension establishes transient, whole-cell polarity that spatially gates engulfment and coordinates whole-cell migration. The microneedle manipulation platform provides a powerful approach for dissecting the spatiotemporal regulation of phagocytosis and for understanding macrophages as adaptive living micromachines integrating mechanical inputs, transient polarity formation, and sequential target processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.