Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42076160›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2026

Fire in an Icy Desert: Oncolytic Virotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Alessandra Rossetto, Alberto Reale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandra RossettoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Alberto RealeDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1737-8635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies, characterized by early metastasis, dense desmoplastic stroma and a profoundly immunosuppressive, lymphocyte-depleted tumor microenvironment that severely limits the efficacy of current systemic and immunotherapeutic approaches. Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which selectively replicate in and lyse malignant cells while activating antitumor immunity, have emerged as attractive candidates to convert this "cold" tumor into a more inflamed and therapeutically responsive disease. In this review, we summarize clinical evidence on the main OV platforms evaluated in PDAC, including adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, vaccinia virus, parvovirus and reovirus, with a focus on clinical trials. Across these classes of viruses, intratumoral administration has consistently proven feasible and generally well tolerated, with frequent evidence of viral replication, microenvironmental remodeling and immune activation, but only modest and often transient antitumor responses in small, early-phase cohorts. We then discuss key biological and translational challenges that currently limit OV impact in PDAC, such as systemic delivery in the context of pre-existing antiviral immunity and rapid clearance, penetration through the fibrotic stroma, and rational selection of encoded transgenes to reshape myeloid cell-driven, pro-tumoral inflammation and enhance T-cell recruitment. Finally, we outline future directions for the field, including carrier-cell-based systemic delivery, stroma-targeting or cytokine-armed constructs, and combinatorial strategies with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade, arguing that design refinement, innovative combinations and mechanism-driven trial designs will be essential to unlock the full therapeutic potential of oncolytic virotherapy in PDAC.

Indexed as

clinical trialsimmunotherapyoncolytic virusespancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID42076160
PMCPMC13118951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.