ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of Catalysts for Hydrogen Production from Methanol.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Methanol is the simplest C1 oxygenated compound possessing the highest hydrogen-to-carbon ratio and can therefore be used as an effective hydrogen carrier. Furthermore, it can be easily transported by land and sea because it is liquid at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Methanol can be converted into hydrogen via methanol steam reforming (MSR), aqueous-phase reforming of methanol (APRM), or aqueous methanol dehydrogenation (AMDH). In this review, various catalysts for MSR, APRM, and AMDH are summarized. Highly active and stable catalysts that can operate under low steam-to-methanol ratios are needed to increase the economics of the MSR process. Compared with the MSR process, the APRM process is rather simple because the water-gas shift reaction can occur simultaneously; however, more constraints exist in the selection of active metals and supports to ensure high activity and stability under APRM conditions. The inherently low reaction rate compared to MSR and the structural vulnerability of the catalyst under severe hydrothermal conditions are obstacles that the APRM catalysts must overcome. The low intrinsic catalytic activity and the high cost of homogeneous catalysts represent fundamental limitations inherent to AMDH catalysts. Based on a literature survey of MSR, APRM, and AMDH catalysts, some future research directions are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.