Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075966›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Internal Benchmarking of Semi-Empirical Methods: Bromine-Containing Crystals as a Sensitive Test Case.

Ilona A Isupova, Denis A Rychkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilona A IsupovaInstitute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 18 Kutateladze Street, 630128 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Denis A RychkovInstitute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 18 Kutateladze Street, 630128 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9269-1627

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-73-10142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting appropriate computational methods for organic crystals becomes particularly challenging for systems containing heavy halogens like bromine, whose complex electronic structures and diverse non-covalent interactions challenge approximate methods. Here we benchmark periodic DFT (PBE-D3BJ), CrystalExplorer (CE17/CE21), DFTB3-D3BJ, and PM7 against experimental stability data for 14 chlorine- and bromine-containing polymorphs across six CSD families. Chlorine systems show method-consistent performance, but bromine introduces large lattice energy variations (>10 kJ/mol) and, in several cases, qualitatively wrong stability rankings. Crucially, low mean absolute errors do not ensure correct thermodynamic ordering, and no semi-empirical method proves universally reliable for bromine. Only PBE-D3BJ achieves perfect experimental agreement. These results position bromine-containing crystals as exceptionally sensitive benchmarks and emphasize internal validation against experiment or reference DFT as essential before large-scale studies-particularly timely as machine-learning potentials emerge.

Indexed as

benchmarkbrominecomputational chemistryCrystalExplorerdensity functional theoryDFTBorganic crystals

Identifiers

PMID42075966
PMCPMC13118614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.