Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075965›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Intraoperative Mass Spectrometry in Oncology: Technologies, Clinical Applications, and Challenges.

Robert Onulov, Marius Georgescu, Corina Flangea, Adela Chirita-Emandi, Alina-Florina Serb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert OnulovDoctoral School, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-8789
Marius GeorgescuPhysiology Discipline, Functional Sciences Department, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-5063
Corina FlangeaPharmacology Discipline, Biochemistry and Pharmacology Department, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Adela Chirita-EmandiGenetics Discipline, Department of Microscopic Morphology, Center of Genomic Medicine, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7554-4625
Alina-Florina SerbBiochemistry Discipline, Biochemistry and Pharmacology Department, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5881-4953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical precision is critical in oncology, where complete tumor resection while preserving healthy tissue directly influences patient outcomes. Traditional intraoperative diagnostic tools, such as frozen-section analysis, are limited by time constraints, tissue sampling, and interpretative variability. Intraoperative mass spectrometry (MS) has recently emerged as a transformative approach, enabling rapid, label-free molecular profiling of surgical specimens in real time. Several technologies-including Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry (REIMS, "iKnife"), Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI-MS), Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI-MS) Imaging, Picosecond InfraRed Laser mass spectrometry (PIRL-MS), and novel devices such as the MasSpec Pen-offer unique strategies for intraoperative tumor characterization. Applications have been demonstrated across multiple cancer types, including brain, breast, gastrointestinal, and urogenital malignancies, where MS can improve margin assessment, tumor classification, and surgical guidance. Beyond its clinical promise, intraoperative MS faces technical and translational challenges, including high infrastructure costs, a lack of standardization, and the need for robust multicenter validation. Integration with artificial intelligence, imaging modalities, and multi-omics approaches may further enhance its clinical utility. This review summarizes current technologies, clinical applications, limitations, and future perspectives of intraoperative MS in oncology, highlighting its potential to reshape surgical oncology practice.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryNeoplasmsHumansIntraoperative PeriodSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationCUSA/SSI-MSDESI-MSintraoperative mass spectrometryMasSpec PenPIRL-MSreal-time molecular diagnosticsREIMS/iKnifeSpiderMass

Identifiers

PMID42075965
PMCPMC13118378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.