ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Molecular Dynamics and Solvated Interaction Energy Prioritize Cannabidiol and Cannabinol as Variant-Spanning SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 Interface Blockers.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters host cells when the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) engages angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Cannabinoid scaffolds have recently been reported to bind S1/RBD, block spike-mediated membrane fusion, and modulate host inflammatory pathways, making them attractive candidates for entry inhibition. Here, we applied an integrated computational pipeline to prioritize cannabis-derived compounds as interfacial blockers of the RBD-ACE2 complex across variants. Eleven phytocannabinoids were docked into the wild-type (WT) RBD-ACE2 interface, identifying three cavities, with ligands preferentially occupying pocket 1. Complexes were subjected to triplicate 200 ns all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for WT, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 RBD-ACE2. Binding energetics were quantified using molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) and solvated interaction energy (SIE), and per-residue contributions were analyzed together with solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) and residue interaction networks. Among all compounds, cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN) were the only ligands that remained stably bound in pocket 1 for all variants. CBN showed the most favorable ligand-complex binding in WT, whereas CBD preserved favorable binding in Omicron BA.1 despite reduced interface burial, indicating that van der Waals/electrostatic complementarity and solvation, rather than surface coverage alone, govern affinity. Both ligands weakened modeled RBD-ACE2 binding by perturbing hot-spot residues centered on Y505 or N501Y in RBD and E37, A387, and R393 in ACE2. Overall, our results highlight CBD and CBN as tractable, variant-spanning interface disruptors and illustrate how MD-based free-energy calculations can support computational drug discovery against evolving viral protein-protein interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.