Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075869›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence Transitions Pharmaceutical Development from Empirical Screening to Predictive Molecular Design and Clinical Trial Optimization.

Ghaith K Mansour, Hatouf H Sukkarieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ghaith K MansourCollege of Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.
Hatouf H SukkariehDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-5989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional paradigm of pharmaceutical research is characterized by substantial inefficiency, requiring extensive timelines and billions of dollars while suffering from high clinical attrition rates. The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is driving a paradigm shift from empirical experimentation toward predictive, data-driven innovation. This review evaluates state-of-the-art applications of these technologies across the drug discovery and development pipeline. By analyzing multi-omics data streams, AI models can elucidate complex disease mechanisms and identify novel therapeutic targets. Deep generative architectures facilitate the algorithmic creation of novel molecular entities, enabling the design of therapeutics with complex polypharmacological profiles. Furthermore, AI is enhancing the clinical testing phase through large language models (LLMs) that improve patient enrollment and through synthetic control arms (SCAs) that provide computational alternatives to traditional placebo groups. Despite these advances, the scientific community must address inherent algorithmic biases stemming from demographic underrepresentation and mitigate the risks of data hallucinations. Ultimately, realizing the full translational potential of generative AI in precision medicine may require the widespread adoption of explainable AI (XAI) frameworks and rigorous data standards.

Indexed as

clinical trial optimizationdeep learningde novo molecular designdrug discoverygenerative artificial intelligencepharmacogenomicsprecision medicinesynthetic control arms

Identifiers

PMID42075869
PMCPMC13118854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.