Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075770›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nipah Virus Encephalitis: Pathogenetic Aspects and Current Therapeutic Strategies.

Gaetano Scotto, Vincenzina Fazio, Ali Muhammed Moula, Sri Charan Bindu Bavisetty, Alessia Franza, Salvatore Massa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaetano ScottoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1406-7797
Vincenzina FazioDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Ali Muhammed MoulaDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM) University, Hyderabad 502329, India.
Sri Charan Bindu BavisettyFaculty of Food Industry, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Alessia FranzaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Salvatore MassaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-9621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipah virus (NiV) is a highly pathogenic zoonotic paramyxovirus responsible for sporadic outbreaks of severe disease with high case fatality rates in South and Southeast Asia. Human infection occurs through spillover from natural reservoirs, primarily fruit bats, or via human-to-human transmission, and is characterized by a broad clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory disease and fatal encephalitis. Following entry via ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 receptors, NiV exhibits marked endothelial and neuronal tropism, leading to systemic vasculitis, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and direct infection of the central nervous system. Disease progression is driven by a complex interplay between viral replication strategies and host immune responses. NiV effectively counteracts innate immunity through multiple viral proteins that inhibit interferon signaling, while simultaneously inducing dysregulated inflammatory responses that contribute to tissue damage and multi-organ failure. Neurological involvement represents the most severe manifestation, often resulting in acute or relapsing encephalitis with long-term sequelae among survivors. Despite the severity of the disease, no licensed antiviral therapies or human vaccines are currently available. Therapeutic development has focused on neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting viral glycoproteins and small-molecule antivirals that inhibit viral RNA synthesis, both of which show promising results in preclinical models, but remain limited by timing and translational challenges. In parallel, several vaccine platforms-including viral vectors, mRNA-based constructs, and recombinant protein subunits-have advanced to early-phase clinical trials, demonstrating encouraging immunogenicity. Beyond biomedical interventions, effective outbreak containment relies on integrated public health strategies. The "Kerala model" highlights the importance of rapid case identification, isolation, contact tracing, and community engagement within a One Health framework to mitigate transmission and reduce mortality. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on NiV pathogenesis, immune evasion, clinical manifestations, and emerging therapeutic and vaccine strategies, while highlighting critical gaps and future directions for improving the preparedness and response to this high-consequence emerging pathogen.

Indexed as

Encephalitis, ViralHenipavirus InfectionsNipah VirusAnimalsAntiviral AgentsHumansAntiviral Agentsencephalitismonoclonal antibodiesneuropathogenesisNipah viruspulmonary involvementrespiratory diseasevaccine developmentzoonotic virus

Identifiers

PMID42075770
PMCPMC13119085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.