ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nipah Virus Encephalitis: Pathogenetic Aspects and Current Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nipah virus infects the brain and triggers neuronal and glial damage in a hamster model.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nipah virus (NiV) is a highly pathogenic zoonotic paramyxovirus responsible for sporadic outbreaks of severe disease with high case fatality rates in South and Southeast Asia. Human infection occurs through spillover from natural reservoirs, primarily fruit bats, or via human-to-human transmission, and is characterized by a broad clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory disease and fatal encephalitis. Following entry via ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 receptors, NiV exhibits marked endothelial and neuronal tropism, leading to systemic vasculitis, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and direct infection of the central nervous system. Disease progression is driven by a complex interplay between viral replication strategies and host immune responses. NiV effectively counteracts innate immunity through multiple viral proteins that inhibit interferon signaling, while simultaneously inducing dysregulated inflammatory responses that contribute to tissue damage and multi-organ failure. Neurological involvement represents the most severe manifestation, often resulting in acute or relapsing encephalitis with long-term sequelae among survivors. Despite the severity of the disease, no licensed antiviral therapies or human vaccines are currently available. Therapeutic development has focused on neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting viral glycoproteins and small-molecule antivirals that inhibit viral RNA synthesis, both of which show promising results in preclinical models, but remain limited by timing and translational challenges. In parallel, several vaccine platforms-including viral vectors, mRNA-based constructs, and recombinant protein subunits-have advanced to early-phase clinical trials, demonstrating encouraging immunogenicity. Beyond biomedical interventions, effective outbreak containment relies on integrated public health strategies. The "Kerala model" highlights the importance of rapid case identification, isolation, contact tracing, and community engagement within a One Health framework to mitigate transmission and reduce mortality. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on NiV pathogenesis, immune evasion, clinical manifestations, and emerging therapeutic and vaccine strategies, while highlighting critical gaps and future directions for improving the preparedness and response to this high-consequence emerging pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.