Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075690›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparison of Serological Methods for the Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis in Pregnant Women.

Nássarah Jabur Lot Rodrigues, Danilo Alves de França, Benedito Donizete Menozzi, Aristeu Vieira da Silva, Joelcio Francisco Abbade, Helio Langoni

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nássarah Jabur Lot RodriguesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-686, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-2903
Danilo Alves de FrançaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1178-5643
Benedito Donizete MenozziDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-686, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-5799
Aristeu Vieira da SilvaDepartment of Biological Sciences, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana 44036-900, BA, Brazil.
Joelcio Francisco AbbadeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-686, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-1451
Helio LangoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-686, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5127-0762

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 33004064065Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2024/23019-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative evaluations of different serological methods for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women remain limited, and the performance of indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), modified agglutination test (MAT), and chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) has not been previously assessed simultaneously in this population. This study aimed to compare the performance of these three serological methods for the detection of

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanPregnancy Complications, ParasiticSerologic TestsToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAdultAgglutination TestsBrazilFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPregnancySensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Mpregnancyprenatalpublic healthserologyToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID42075690
PMCPMC13118545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.