ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Risk-Adapted Selective Elective Nodal Irradiation in the Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Era for Rectal Cancer.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer treatment, multidisciplinary treatment options have become more diverse than before, and many challenges remain unresolved. A randomized clinical study in intermediate-risk locally advanced rectal cancer showed that neoadjuvant full-dose systemic chemotherapy with response-adapted omission of radiation therapy is non-inferior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Given that preoperative systemic chemotherapy provides an additional layer of local disease control, the traditional role and extent of neoadjuvant radiation therapy could be strategically re-evaluated within the TNT framework. In this context, a risk-adapted approach featuring selective reduction in elective nodal irradiation volume, particularly of the lateral pelvic lymph nodes, may offer a promising middle ground for treatment personalization. Drawing parallels from surgical practice-where total mesorectal excision is standard but lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is reserved for selected cases-this perspective advocates for similar selectivity in radiation therapy targeting, focusing on mesorectal and presacral regions while judiciously omitting lateral nodes in appropriately selected patients. This approach could maintain oncologic safety by focusing radiation therapy on limited but essential volumes. With modern intensity-modulated radiation therapy, reducing the target volume translates directly to enhanced organs-at-risk sparing, thereby mitigating radiation-induced toxicity. When combined with induction chemotherapy response assessment to refine patient selection, this approach can offer a biologically informed, personalized treatment paradigm that balances disease control with quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.