ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography as a Gatekeeper for Invasive Coronary Assessment Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Diagnosis and Revascularization Guidance of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- How to Individualize Coronary Assessment and Revascularization in Severe AS Patients Undergoing TAVI in the Era of Lifetime Management?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the predominant treatment strategy for severe aortic stenosis across all surgical risk categories. The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 40-75% of TAVI candidates has traditionally mandated pre-procedural invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), which is already integral to TAVI planning for annular sizing and access route evaluation, offers the potential to assess coronary anatomy simultaneously. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that CTCA possesses excellent sensitivity (90-97%) and high negative predictive value (94-99%) for excluding significant proximal CAD, potentially serving as a reliable gatekeeper to avoid unnecessary ICA in a substantial proportion of patients. This approach is particularly attractive given the questionable benefit of routine pre-emptive coronary revascularization in stable TAVI candidates, as demonstrated by the ACTIVATION and NOTION-3 trials. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the diagnostic performance of CTCA, clinical outcomes with CT-guided strategies, technical considerations and limitations, and the evolving paradigm of coronary assessment in the contemporary TAVI era. We propose a practical algorithm integrating CTCA as a first-line screening tool, reserving ICA for patients with suspected significant proximal disease, thereby optimizing resource utilization while maintaining patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.