ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Remote Sensing and AI Techniques in Agriculture and Forestry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Towards Robust UAV Navigation in Agriculture: Key Technologies, Application, and Future Directions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) is increasingly limited by the mismatch between the need for field-relevant, fine-grained phenotypic information and the restricted capability of conventional observation platforms under complex agricultural conditions. Ground mobile robots are emerging as the key carrier for resolving this gap because they combine close-range sensing, autonomous mobility, and physical interaction within real field environments. In this paper, a structured scoping review is presented using a closed-loop perception-decision-action pipeline as the organizing principle. Within this framework, recent advances are synthesized from the perspectives of multimodal fusion, localization-aware sensing, motion planning, deep-learning-based phenotypic analysis, active observation, robotic intervention, and edge deployment. The review further clarifies the complementary roles of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs), and air-ground collaboration in multiscale phenotyping workflows. Beyond summarizing technologies, the article provides three concrete deliverables: a structured taxonomy of mobile phenotyping systems; comparative tables covering sensing modalities, localization/navigation methods, and AI models; and a research agenda linking technical progress to field deployability. The synthesis highlights four persistent bottlenecks, namely environmental generalization, annotation scarcity, limited standardization and reproducibility, and the gap between advanced models and agricultural edge hardware. Overall, ground robots are identified not merely as sensing platforms, but as the central system architecture for advancing mobile phenotyping toward autonomous, fine-grained, and field-deployable operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.