Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075306›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2026

Biosurfactants as Antibiofilm Agents for Medical Devices: Mechanisms, Evidence and Integration into Infection Prevention and Control.

Sunday Stephen Abi, Ibrahim M Banat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sunday Stephen AbiIndependent Researcher, Nottingham NG7 7JG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4533-2837
Ibrahim M BanatSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-2840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms rapidly form on medical devices such as urinary catheters and surgical materials. These biofilms compromise patient safety and undermine infection prevention and control (IPC). Biofilms also reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics and disinfectants. As a result, they increase healthcare-associated infections and increase costs through device failure and the need for maintenance or replacement. Researchers are increasingly exploring biosurfactants (BSs) as surface coatings and cleaning additives to prevent microbial attachment and disrupt early biofilm formation on medical devices and healthcare-related surfaces. This review examines the translational potential of biosurfactants as preventive, disruptive, and adjunctive antibiofilm agents for medical devices and healthcare-related surfaces. Literature evidence on glycolipids (rhamnolipids, sophorolipids) and lipopeptides (surfactin) from static, flow-based, and microfluidic in vitro models that used clinically relevant materials, such as silicone and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were examined. In our literature search, we focused on pathogens central to IPC, such as

Indexed as

antiadhesionantimicrobialsbiofilmbiosurfactantshealthcareinfection preventionmedical devices

Identifiers

PMID42075306
PMCPMC13119259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.