ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Sampling Schemes in Poliovirus Wastewater Surveillance Studies from European Countries and Their Comparison to Other Studies: A Literature Review.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poliovirus wastewater surveillance (WWS) is an important complementary system to acute flaccid paralysis surveillance and a substitute surveillance for enteroviruses in stool samples of children, within global poliovirus eradication efforts. However, current guidelines provide limited data on sampling schemes for polio-free countries. This study aims to provide a summary of sampling schemes used for poliovirus WWS in studies done in countries of European Union (EU), together with an analysis of their objectives and a comparison with studies done in other countries. The study selection for this literature review was based on three sources: a World Health Organisation literature review, the PubMed database, and a systematic literature review of WWS of communicable disease agents. From 1446 studies, 72 studies published between 1 January 1995 and 5 September 2024 were included in the qualitative analysis. These studies were analysed by country of origin, objective, sampling site, catchment population size, sampling frequency, sampling method and sample volume. The results indicate that most studies from EU countries had conducted poliovirus WWS directly in line with World Health Organisation recommendations, despite these being primarily designed for developing countries. Our review may encourage countries to optimise their poliovirus WWS systems based on their own risks for poliovirus introduction and circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.