ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Probiotics and Antibiotics: From Empirical Practice to a Biological Rationale for Targeted Choice During Antibiotic Therapy.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic therapy represents one of the strongest ecological perturbations of the human gut microbiota, inducing rapid and often prolonged alterations in community structure, metabolic activity, and functional resilience. While the use of probiotics to mitigate antibiotic-associated dysbiosis is widely adopted in clinical practice, probiotic selection is still largely empirical and insufficiently grounded in biological compatibility with specific antibiotic pressures. In this conceptual review, antibiotics are reframed not merely as antimicrobial agents, but as ecological forces that shape microbial survival, quiescence, and recolonization dynamics. We propose a biologically informed framework that distinguishes genetic antibiotic resistance from functional or ecological insensitivity, highlighting how microbial traits, such as the absence or inaccessibility of the antibiotic target, metabolic state, sporulation, and cellular architecture, influence the persistence of probiotics during antibiotic exposure. By integrating the mechanisms of action of antibiotics with key physiological and structural features of probiotic microorganisms, we develop a conceptual framework aimed at rationalizing the compatibility of probiotics and antibiotics. This framework does not imply clinical efficacy but provides an interpretative tool to guide hypothesis generation, experimental validation, and the design of future targeted probiotic strategies. A more ecologically grounded approach to probiotic selection may ultimately improve microbiota support during antibiotic therapy and advance personalized microbiome modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.